Test Cases¶
Overview¶
Test cases are the means by which a specific testing scenario is implemented. One or more test cases form the content of a test suite. The following example represents a complete, simple test case for the validation of an invoice that is uploaded by a user.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<testcase id="UBL_invoice_validation_test_1" xmlns="http://www.gitb.com/tdl/v1/" xmlns:gitb="http://www.gitb.com/core/v1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.gitb.com/tdl/v1/ ../../gitb_tdl.xsd">
<metadata>
<gitb:name>UBL_invoice_validation_test_1</gitb:name>
<gitb:type>CONFORMANCE</gitb:type>
<gitb:version>1.0</gitb:version>
<gitb:description>Test case to verify the correctness of a UBL invoice. The invoice is provided manually through user upload.</gitb:description>
</metadata>
<imports>
<artifact type="schema" encoding="UTF-8" name="UBL_Invoice_Schema_File">UBL_invoice_validation/artifacts/UBL/maindoc/UBL-Invoice-2.1.xsd</artifact>
<artifact type="object" encoding="UTF-8" name="BII_CORE_Invoice_Schematron_File">UBL_invoice_validation/artifacts/BII/BII_CORE/BIICORE-UBL-T10-V1.0.xsl</artifact>
</imports>
<variables>
<var name="file_content" type="object"/>
</variables>
<actors>
<gitb:actor id="User" name="User" role="SUT"/>
</actors>
<steps>
<!--
Step 1. Request the user to upload the UBL invoice.
-->
<interact desc="UBL invoice upload" with="User">
<request desc="Upload the UBL invoice to validate" with="User" contentType="BASE64">$file_content</request>
</interact>
<!--
Step 2. Validate the uploaded invoice.
-->
<verify handler="XSDValidator" desc="Validate invoice against UBL 2.1 Invoice Schema">
<input name="xmldocument">$file_content</input>
<input name="xsddocument" source="$UBL_Invoice_Schema_File"/>
</verify>
<verify handler="SchematronValidator" desc="Validate invoice against BII2 CORE restrictions for Invoice Transaction">
<input name="xmldocument">$file_content</input>
<input name="schematron" source="$BII_CORE_Invoice_Schematron_File"/>
</verify>
</steps>
</testcase>
The following table provides an overview of the attributes and child elements that a testcase
may have. A more detailed discussion per case
follows in the subsequent sections.
Name | Required? | Description |
---|---|---|
@id | yes | A string to uniquely identify the test case by. This is referenced in the test suite XML. |
metadata | yes | A block containing the metadata used to describe the test case. |
namespaces | no | An optional set of namespaces to define the expression languages used in the test case. |
imports | no | An optional set of imports used to load additional resources from the test suite. |
preliminary | no | An optional set of user interaction steps to display before the test session starts. |
variables | no | An optional set of variables that are used in the test case. |
actors | yes | The set of actors that this test case refers to. |
steps | yes | The sequence of steps that this test case foresees. |
scriptlets | no | Optional named groups of test steps which can be used within the test case. |
Elements¶
We will now see how a test case breaks down into its individual sections and discuss the purpose of each.
Metadata¶
The metadata
element is basically the same as the one defined for the test suite Metadata. Its purpose is to provide basic information
about the test case to help users understand its purpose. Its structure is as follows:
Name | Required? | Description |
---|---|---|
name | yes | The name of the test case that is used to identify it to users. |
type | no | Either “CONFORMANCE” (the default) or “INTEROPERABILITY”. “INTEROPERABILITY” is used when more than one actor are defined as SUTs. |
version | yes | A string that indicates the test case’s version. |
authors | no | A string to indicate the test case’s authors. |
description | no | A string to provide a user-friendly description of the test case that is displayed to users. |
published | no | A string acting as an indication of the test case’s publishing time. |
lastModified | no | A string acting as an indication of the last modification time for the test case. |
Note
GITB software support: Contrary to a test suite’s name
, the name
of the test case is recorded but not otherwise used. Matching of test cases
and display uses the test case’s id
attribute. Regarding the test case type
this must currently be set to “CONFORMANCE” (the default value) as the
“INTEROPERABILITY” type is not supported. Finally, the version
, authors
, published
and lastModified
values are recorded but never used or displayed.
Namespaces¶
The namespaces
optional element is used to define one or more expression languages that are used in test case constructs that support them. This needs to
be done when expressions are used that should not be processed using the default XPath 1.0 language. A detailed discussion on GITB expressions as well
as where and how you can use them is provided in Expressions. Each referred expression language is defined in a namespace
element with
the following structure:
Name | Required? | Description |
---|---|---|
ns | yes | One or more elements to define the expression languages used in the test case. Each ns element must specify a prefix attribute to define the namespace prefix. |
The values specified in the prefix
attributes define how each expression language is referenced within the test case. As an example consider a test case that needs to
check a number variable var
and set a result
variable with “result1” if var
is 1 or with “result2” otherwise. Simple if-else constructs like this are a good
example of a shortcoming of XPath 1.0 as they are not natively supported and need a non-intuitive workaround based on string concatenation. A simpler approach would be to use
a scripting language more adapted to this kind of operation such as JavaScript. The following test case illustrates this assignment using both the default XPath 1.0 and
JavaScript:
<testcase>
<namespaces>
<ns prefix="JavaScript"/>
</namespaces>
<variables>
<var name="var" type="number"/>
<var name="result" type="string"/>
</variables>
<steps>
<!--
Assignment using the default XPath 1.0.
-->
<assign to="$result">concat(substring('result1', 1 div number(boolean($var = 1))), substring('result2', 1 div number(not(boolean($var = 1)))))</assign>
<!--
Assignment using JavaScript.
-->
<assign to="$result" lang="JavaScript">if ($var == 1) { return 'result1' } else { return 'result2' }</assign>
</steps>
</testcase>
Needless to say the assignment using JavaScript is much more natural and easy to understand. However use of alternative expression languages, and their definition
through the namespaces
element, is tricky because we need to know exactly how the target test bed refers to the language (i.e. “JavaScript” in our case) to
correctly identify it. Furthermore it must be clear how the test bed will process the expression and how session context variables are looked up. In the above example
we assume that context variables (e.g. “$var”) are looked up in exactly the same way as with XPath 1.0 expressions and that the entire expression will be evaluated
by first wrapping it in a function, the result of which is returned as the assignment output. Apart from actually supporting JavaScript for expressions, these
additional details need to first be defined unambiguously by the test bed and made known to its users. Only then can we use them in a deterministic and portable manner.
Note
GITB software support: Expression languages other than the default XPath 1.0 are not supported. As such the namespaces
element is currently ignored.
Imports¶
The imports
element allows the use of arbitrary resources that are present in the test suite. This can be very useful when a test case needs to send messages
based on a template or load a binary file that is needed as input by a messaging, processing or validation handler (e.g. a certificate). The imports
element
defines one or more artifact
children with the following structure:
Name | Required? | Description | |
---|---|---|---|
@name | yes | The name with which this artefact will be associated to the test session context for subsequent lookups. | |
@type | yes | The type as which the artefact needs to be loaded. | |
@encoding | no | In case the artefact is to be treated as text | this is the character encoding to apply when reading its bytes (default is “UTF-8”). |
The text value of the artifact
element is the path within the test suite from which the relevant resource will be loaded. Regarding the type
attribute, this needs to refer to an appropriate type from the GITB type system (see Types). Given that in this case we are referring to a file
being loaded, the types that can be used are:
binary
: Load the artefact as a set of bytes without additional processing.object
: Load the artefact as a XML Document Object Model. In this case it is best to also explicitly provide theencoding
to consider.schema
: Load the artefact as a XML Schema. As in theobject
case it is best to explicitly provide theencoding
to consider.
Regarding the path to the resource, this considers as the root the name of the test suite, followed by the resource’s path within the test suite archive. As an
example consider the following test case fragment where a XML schema is loaded and set in the session context as a variable of type schema
that is named “ublSchema”. The
path specified suggests that this test case is part of a test suite with name “UBL_invoice_validation” (the path root) and the file itself is named
“UBL-Invoice-2.1.xsd” and exists in a folder within the test suite archive named “resources”.
<testcase>
<imports>
<artifact type="schema" encoding="UTF-8" name="ublSchema">UBL_invoice_validation/resources/UBL-Invoice-2.1.xsd</artifact>
</imports>
<steps>
<verify handler="XSDValidator" desc="Validate invoice against UBL 2.1 Invoice Schema">
<!--
Variable $fileContent is loaded in another step.
-->
<input name="xmldocument">$fileContent</input>
<input name="xsddocument" source="$ublSchema"/>
</verify>
</steps>
</testcase>
Note
Test module import: The GITB TDL schema allows also for module
elements to be defined for the import of test modules (validation,
messaging and processing handlers). This approach is no longer supported as it required the handler implementations to be bundled within
the test bed itself. The preferred and simpler approach now is to simply define the handler in the respective test step (e.g. the verify
step’s handler
attribute for validators) without previously importing it.
Preliminary¶
The preliminary
element allows the test case to interact with the user before the test session begins. The purpose here is to allow the
user to provide preliminary input or be informed of certain actions that need to take place before the test session starts. In terms of structure
and use, the preliminary
element is a UserInteraction
element (see interact). The difference is that the interaction takes place before the
test session actually starts.
The following example shows a test case that prompts the user before starting to initialise their server and upload a configuration file.
<testcase>
<preliminary desc="Prepare your system" with="User">
<instruct desc="Preparation instructions" with="User" type="string">"Make sure your system is up and running"</instruct>
<request desc="Provide your configuration file" with="User" contentType="BASE64">$sutConfigFile</request>
</preliminary>
<variables>
<var name="sutConfigFile" type="binary"/>
</variables>
<actors>
<gitb:actor id="User" name="User" role="SUT"/>
</actors>
<steps>
<!--
The provided file can be referenced as $sutConfigFile
-->
</steps>
</testcase>
Actors¶
The actors
element is where the test case defines the actors involved in its steps and, importantly, their role. It contains
one or more actor
children with the following structure:
Name | Required? | Description |
---|---|---|
@id | yes | The actor’s unique (within the specification) ID. This must match an actor ID specified in the test suite. |
@name | yes | The name to display for the actor. This can differ from the ID to display an actor name specific to the test case. |
@role | yes | The actor’s role in the test case. This is “SUT” if the actor is the focus of the test case, “SIMULATED” if the actor is simulated by the test bed, or “MONITOR” if the actor is present for monitoring purposes. |
endpoint | no | An optional sequence of configuration endpoints if the actor is simulated. |
The endpoint
elements require a bit more explanation to understand their use. A specification may foresee actors that are all valid
selections for conformance statements. Imagine a specification that defines “sender” and “receiver” actors that can both be the SUTs
depending on the actor a system selects to conform to. As such, a test suite focusing on the sender will include test cases with the
sender as the SUT and the receiver as being simulated. Similarly, a test suite focusing on the receiver will define the
receiver as SUT and the sender as simulated. In terms of configuration properties, the sender might need to define a “replyToAddress” to receive
replies, whereas the receiver simply needs to define his “deliveryAddress” which is where messages are expected. In terms of actor configuration
in the test suite this would look like this:
<testsuite>
<gitb:actor id="sender">
<gitb:name>Sender</gitb:name>
<gitb:endpoint name="info">
<gitb:config name="replyToAddress" desc="The address to return replies to" kind="SIMPLE"/>
</gitb:endpoint>
</gitb:actor>
<gitb:actor id="receiver">
<gitb:name>Receiver</gitb:name>
<gitb:endpoint name="info">
<gitb:config name="deliveryAddress" desc="The address to receive messages on" kind="SIMPLE"/>
</gitb:endpoint>
</gitb:actor>
</testsuite>
Depending on the test case at hand, the user will be expected to provide the appropriate configuration parameters. For example, in a conformance statement for the sender, the applicable test cases will be those defining the sender actor as the SUT, and the “replyToAddress” parameter will need to be entered before starting the test. How is the “deliveryAddress” then provided for the simulated receiver actor? This can be achieved in two ways:
- Dynamically by the simulated actor’s messaging handler. Using this approach, the test bed, while in its initiation phase, will request configuration properties from the handler that will be mapped to the SUT’s corresponding endpoint (see Endpoints to map simulated actor configuration).
- Statically by defining the endpoint and one or more of its parameters within the test case itself.
The second option is why we are able to configure endpoint
elements as part of the test case. The values configured here will be used only
if not already specified by the response of the simulated actor’s handler. The below snippet illustrates this considering the sender as the SUT:
<testcase>
<gitb:actor id="sender" name="sender" role="SUT"/>
<gitb:actor id="receiver" name="receiver" role="SIMULATED">
<gitb:endpoint name="info">
<gitb:config name="deliveryAddress">SIMULATED_ADDRESS</gitb:config>
</gitb:endpoint>
</gitb:actor>
<steps>
<!--
receiver's address can be referenced by $sender{receiver}{deliveryAddress}
-->
</steps>
</testcase>
Note
GITB software support: The “MONITOR” value for the actor role
is currently not supported.
Variables¶
The variables
element can be defined to create one or more variables that will be used during the test case’s execution. It contains one
or more var
elements, one per variable, with the following structure:
Name | Required? | Description |
---|---|---|
@name | yes | The name of the variable. It is with this name that the variable can be referenced. |
@type | yes | The type of the variable. One of the GITB data types can be used (see Types). |
value | no | One or more values for the variable. More than one values are applicable in case of a map or list type. |
Variables can be used to record arbitrary information for the duration of the test session. These can be fixed values defined along with the
variable’s definition or dynamically produced values resulting from test steps. The way to reference variables is defined based on the expression
language in place. Using the default XPath 1.0 expression language a variable named myVar
is referenced as $myVar
. More information on
expressions to reference variable values is provided in Expressions.
The following example shows use of two variables, one to store a user-uploaded file and another to store a part of it, extracted via XPath:
<testcase>
<imports>
<artifact type="schema" encoding="UTF-8" name="schemaFile">testSuite/artifacts/UBL/maindoc/UBL-Invoice-2.1.xsd</artifact>
</imports>
<variables>
<var name="fileContent" type="object"/>
<var name="targetElement" type="object"/>
</variables>
<steps>
<!--
Store the uploaded result in the fileContent variable.
-->
<interact desc="UBL invoice upload" with="User">
<request desc="Upload the UBL invoice to validate" with="User" contentType="BASE64">$fileContent</request>
</interact>
<!--
Extract a part of it and store in the targetElement variable.
-->
<assign to="$targetElement" source="$fileContent">/*[local-name() = 'testcase']/*[local-name() = 'steps']</assign>
<!--
Pass the targetElement for validation.
-->
<verify handler="XSDValidator" desc="Validate content">
<input name="xmldocument">$targetElement</input>
<input name="xsddocument" source="$schemaFile"/>
</verify>
</steps>
</testcase>
Setting a variable’s initial value is achieved using the value
element, with one or more being used in case of a map
or list
type. The following example illustrates setting values for different variable types:
<testcase>
<variables>
<var name="aList" type="list[string]">
<value>List value 1</value>
<value>List value 2</value>
</var>
<var name="aMap" type="map">
<value name="key1" type="string">Map value 1</value>
<value name="key2" type="string">Map value 2</value>
</var>
<var name="aString" type="string">
<value>A string value</value>
</var>
</variables>
</testcase>
Note
List variables: When a list
is defined as a variable it also needs to specify its internal element type. To do this you
need to specify the type
attribute as list[INTERNAL_TYPE]
. For example a list
of string
elements is defined as
<var name="myList" type="list[string]"/>
.
Note
GITB software support: Currently values for variables are defined in a fixed manner. Using expressions to set variable values is not supported.
Steps¶
The steps
element is where the test case’s testing logic is implemented. It consists of a sequence of test steps that use a GITB
TDL step construct per test step. The available test steps that can be defined are:
Step name | Description |
---|---|
send | Send a message to an actor |
receive | Receive a message from an actor |
listen | Listen for exchanged messages between actors |
btxn | Begin a messaging transaction |
etxn | End a messaging transaction |
process | Process a set of inputs to get an output |
bptxn | Begin a processing transaction |
eptxn | End a processing transaction |
if | Apply if-else logic to conditionally execute test steps |
while | Loop over a set of steps while a condition is true |
repuntil | Repeat a set of steps while a condition is true (executing at least once) |
foreach | Execute a set of steps a fixed number of times |
flow | Execute sets of steps concurrently |
exit | Immediately terminate the test session |
assign | Process an expression and assign its output to a variable |
group | Display a set of steps as a logical group |
verify | Validate content |
call | Call a scriptlet |
interact | Trigger an interaction with the user |
Scriptlets¶
The scriptlets
element is meant to define reusable blocks of steps that can be called during the test case’s execution.
They are similar to function blocks in programming languages considering that:
- They receive inputs and produce outputs.
- They define a nested context for their own variables and processing that is isolated from the test session context.
- They can access variables from the parent test session context.
The main benefit of using scriptlets is really one of test step organisation to avoid copying (and then maintaining) sequences
of steps that might be executed multiple times and at different locations in the test case. Each scriptlet is defined in a
scriptlet
element with the following structure:
Name | Required? | Description |
---|---|---|
@id | yes | The ID of the scriptlet used to refer to it in call steps (see call). |
metadata | no | Optional scriptlet metadata. Structurally this matches exactly the metadata for the test case (see Metadata). |
namespaces | no | Optional namespaces for contained expressions. Structurally this matches exactly the namespaces for the test case (see Namespaces). |
imports | no | Optional artefacts to import for the scriptlet. Structurally this matches exactly the imports for the test case (see Imports). |
params | no | An optional set of parameters that the scriptlet will expect from a call step (see call). |
variables | no | An optional set of local variables. Structurally this matches exactly the variables for the test case (see Variables). |
steps | yes | The sequence of steps to be executed in this scriptlet. Can contain any supported test steps (see Steps). |
output | yes | One or more output values resulting from the scriptlet’s execution. |
The params
and variables
for the scriptlet define their individual elements as var
elements. These follow the same structure and
logic as the test cases variables (see Variables).
A scriptlet is called using its id
in a call
step (see call). As part of this call
the test case needs to pass as inputs any parameters that
the scriptlet expects. Concerning the scriptlet’s output, each defined output
value will be evaluated once the scriptlet completes and the overall result
will be returned as a map
named using the id
used in the relevant call
step that triggered it’s execution. Regarding output values:
- If the
call
does not specify namedoutput
elements then all the scriptlet’s outputs will be returned. - If the
call
does specify namedoutput
elements only these will be returned.
The following example shows a scriptlet
that will validate a file passed as an input parameter. Once completed it will also
return a string
result for a value provided by the user. Calling the scriptlet occurs for two different files and results in the
display of their output values.
<testcase>
<steps>
<!--
Request two files to be uploaded.
-->
<interact desc="Upload files" with="User">
<request desc="Upload the first file" with="User" contentType="BASE64">$fileContent1</request>
<request desc="Upload the second file" with="User" contentType="BASE64">$fileContent2</request>
</interact>
<!--
Call the scriptlet for the first file and store the result under variable "call1".
-->
<call id="call1" path="script1">
<input name="docToValidate">$fileContent1</input>
<output name="outputMessage"/>
</call>
<!--
Call the scriptlet for the second file and store the result under variable "call2".
-->
<call id="call2" path="script1">
<input name="docToValidate">$fileContent2</input>
<output name="outputMessage"/>
</call>
<!--
Display the results from both calls to the user.
-->
<interact desc="Scriptlet results" with="User">
<instruct desc="Output one" with="User" type="string">$call1{outputMessage}</instruct>
<instruct desc="Output two" with="User" type="string">$call2{outputMessage}</instruct>
</interact>
</steps>
<scriptlets>
<scriptlet id="script1">
<!--
This parameter has to be provided when calling the scriptlet.
-->
<params>
<var name="docToValidate" type="object"/>
</params>
<!--
These variables are only locally visible.
-->
<variables>
<var name="userMessage" type="string"/>
<var name="outputMessage" type="string"/>
<var name="anotherOutputMessage" type="string">
<value>Another value</value>
</var>
</variables>
<steps>
<!--
Ask the user to enter a string value.
-->
<interact desc="Scriptlet call" with="User">
<request desc="Give me a value" with="User" type="string">$userMessage</request>
</interact>
<!--
Validate the file passed as a parameter.
-->
<verify handler="XSDValidator" desc="Validate content">
<input name="xmldocument">$docToValidate</input>
<!--
The schemaFile variable is retrieved from the global session context
(its declaration is ommitted from the example).
-->
<input name="xsddocument" source="$schemaFile"/>
</verify>
<assign to="$outputMessage">$userMessage</assign>
</steps>
<!--
This output is returned as it is specified in the call.
-->
<output name="outputMessage" type="string">$outputMessage</output>
<!--
This output is not specified in the call and is thus ignored.
-->
<output name="anotherOutputMessage" type="string">$anotherOutputMessage</output>
</scriptlet>
</scriptlets>
</testcase>
Note
GITB software support: Currently the GITB software requires that scriptlets have at least one variable and one parameter. In addition, declared outputs must also exist as declared scriptlet variables.